Closed LinusU closed 13 years ago
Yes, it should. It's simply a case of not having the time to move it out into it's own file but yes you're correct. I would advise anybody to move it into a separate file.
When I eventually finish everything and release v1.0 then I'll make sure everything is properly packaged up and likely separate functional styles and aesthetic styles for easy customisation.
Ok, thanks for the quick response! I guess that the goal is to be integrated into jQuery UI, or are you planning on releasing this as a stand alone plugin?
When I get some spare time I'll tidy everything up and release this as version 1.0 and see what happens but it'd be nice if it was considered for jQuery UI but I believe they're busy re-factoring a lot of their current widgets and working on a grid et. al. so I don't see it being all that likely, at least not until 1.9 is out the door.
@richardscarrott I'm in the same boat with several of my plugins. I think it's best to not use the jQuery UI namespace until it becomes part of the official jQuery UI library. I talked with some of the UI staff about this, they recommend using your own namespace in the widget definition and releasing the code as a jQuery plugin (jquery-carousel).
Yeah I wish I had used my own namespace in the first place as I only became aware that it's frowned upon to use the ui namespace after I had set it up on github. I've every intention of moving it out to my own namespace but it's just a case of finding the time!
@richardscarrott Yeah, I did the same thing, seems like a common misconception. The jQuery UI team is pretty forgiving, though they do appreciate it when things are re-namespaced.
Shouldn't the css be in a separate file called jquery.ui.carousel.css? I might have overlooked something and there might be a valid reason for keeping the css inlined but it seems more clean to have it in a separate file.