Closed richelbilderbeek closed 3 years ago
I guess we need to prove the percentage is not zero.
bbbq_article_issue_157
it is:
Replied:
The reviewer is right that we do not show any statistics here and we are happy this omission was spotted. However, unlike most omitted statistics tests, this would be an exception when adding a statistical test would not make sense.
To clarify, we considered adding the text below to describe the statistical test:
We used a binomial statistical test to determine if more TMH-derived epitopes are presented than expected, with the number of epitopes being the number of trails, the number of TMH-derived epitopes being the number of successful trials, for a estimated chance of success of zero. This resulted in highly significant values, indicating there were seignificantly more TMH-derived epitopes presented than expected.
We still feel it would be better to leave out this trivial statistics test, as it sets readers on the wrong foot: any binomial test with a chance of a successful trial, p, of zero (in R code: binom.test(x = 109, n = 7897, p = 0.0)) always results in a p value of zero.
Fixed with 3cbbb1cca578341fcce51cd7218d711dcede9048
Needed for #228, where is now wirtten:
The reviewer is right that we do not show any statistics here; we were simply already convinced that 1.3% (for MHC-I) and 3.9% (for MHC-II) of the in vivo presented epitopes to be of (predicted) TMH origin, as the expected percentages would be zero percent. We agree with the reviewer and we did [some statistical tests]