Is it significant the overlapping of one residue for MHC binding?
Why not consider only those peptides that are really predicted and
analyze them if they are really found in experimental data? Contribution
of one residue of the TMH to the ligand is almost anecdotic even more
if this contribution mainly affects N or C-terminal positions.
It is logically to see these residues located near outside the lipid
bilayer because they are more “available” to be processed independently
of what the mechanistic process is. It would be nice to saw how the
TMH contributes to every position of the ligand predicted compared to
those experimentally confirmed.
[ ] Richel: check with 2 AAs overlap, demonstrate that this does not matter,
use one haplotype :-)
[ ] Richel: Less overlap means less TMH-derived epitopes, hence lower statistical power
From a reviewer: