richelbilderbeek / pbdmms

Some models
GNU General Public License v3.0
2 stars 0 forks source link

sado / kewe: (parameter) SPACE EXPLORATION #207

Closed Lumphie closed 7 years ago

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

I ran 100 simulations of the sado model (used swap, lut and no bug to make it quicker)

All parameters were the same as the sado article except for sigma c, which started at 0.01 (first simulation) and ended at 1.0 (100th simulation)

I created this wonderful GIF of the ecological type.

Sigma_C from 0.01 - 1

Female preference is still uploading.

Will make more simulations that increase other parameters and see what works.

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Ecotype branching as in the article happens somewhere around 0.6-0.7

For the next exploration of parameters space simulations sc will be set to 0.6

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Female preference with increasing sigma c. Not really interesting. female preference with increasing sigma c

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

runs with sigma e are just in. Not really interesting.

Best around 0.5-0.6 probably.

For the next exploration of parameters space simulations se will be set to 0.5

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

On peregrine now: sk from 0.02 - 2.0 (Simulations12) sm from 0.005 - 0.5 (simulations_sm)

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

The queue is taking too long. Will check back tomorrow!

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Higher sigma k => more and more stable branching for ecotype. Maybe more branching on sexual traits, but not a very high effect.

gif is incoming

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

sigmak_on_eco_type

As expected. Biggerresource distribution gives more room for branching.

Will stay with 1.2 sk for now with the knowledge that I can increase it whenever needed.

No (or small) effect on sexual traits

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Something went wrong with the sigma_m simulations. Will rerun them after sigma_q is done.

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

No fancy gifs of sigma Q.

Nothing interesting. We'll keep it at 1

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Nothing interesting in sigma_m I keep it at 0.2

Will run multiple simulations of

sm 0.2 sq 1.0 sk 1.2 se 0.5 sc 0.6

Overlapping should have branching. Separate generations does not according to the gui.

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Okay lets just use the same exploration techniques for separate generations

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

So many problems... euhm challenges.

Forgot to scale c to the population size. It was stalled at 1700 individuals. It should run now with scaled c

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Note to all: All computers reset at 22:30.

Something I just found out.

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Increasing C (not sigma c) increases eco type branching with seperate generations. Now I just need a way to increase the sexual traits branching

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

sep_c_on_eco_type

Okay another one, because they are so pretty.

Increasing c (the constant) increases the chance of branching, but it also increases the chance of nobody surviving.

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

sep_c_female_pref

And this is female preference.

Right now increasing population size is running and sigma m

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

increasing sm to 1.0 gets very close to branching on female preference, but somehow not on male trait...

Which is of course because making sm higher lowers selection pressure on the outsiders of female preference, but not on the outsiders of male trait.

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

sep_sm_fem_pref

Female preference for an increasing sm.

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

300 simulations running right now!

different population sizes sq and 100 random simulations with the following parameters

sc 0.6 sk 2.0 sv 0.02 se 3.0 (!!!) pop 10,000 (!) c 0.000005 sm 1.0 (!) sq 1.0 (I expect this should be enough)

Only time will tell what'll happen.

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Okay so the 100 random simulations are in. Not looking like it's enough.

In order:

Eco_trait Fem_pref Male_trait

eco_traits1

fem_prefs1

male_traits1

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Can't get the male trait to follow the females. sq might be too high.

Eco type is not getting big enough, so higher Sk and probably a higher Sc (to get the branching hopefully)

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Or maybe increase c a bit.

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Now running:

sc 1.2 sk 4.0 sv 0.02 se 3.0 (!!!) pop 10,000 (!) c 0.00005 sm 1.0 (!) sq 0.5

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Also

sc 0.6 sv 0.02 se 0.5 pop0 1000 c 0.0005 sm 1.0 sq 0.6 type0 0 0 0' > kewe_sado_parameters${i}.txt

echo "seed ${i}" >> kewe_sado_parameters${i}.txt

sk=$(printf '%s * %s\n' "$i" "0.05" | bc) echo "sk $sk" >> kewe_sado_parameters${i}.txt

Increasing sk (0.05 -> 5.0 with steps of 0.05)

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

If eco_trait branches anyway a low se should let the sexual traits follow.

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

So I have to get ecotype to branch first.

Starting at sk this time.

sm 0.2 sq 1.0 sk 1.2 se 0.5 sc 0.6

These gave branching at both ecotype and sexual trait in the overlapping generations. Running increase sk now (starting at 0.05, ending at 5.0)

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

increasing c looks promising:

ecotype fempref maletrait eco_traits fem_prefs male_traits

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

ONE DAY WE WILL FIND THOSE PARAMETERS! BUT IT IS NOT THIS DAY! THIS DAY WE USE PEREGRINE. FOR SADOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Running simulation for 40.000 generations for around 10.000 individuals and a resource distribution of 10.0.

Lets see what happens.

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Simulation got stuck because population size kept increasing. Increased c and ran it again.

It's not at generation 20.000 so halfway! :smile: 14.000 individuals now.

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

Damnit eco_traits fem_prefs male_traits

Lumphie commented 7 years ago

I think I found some parameters which have speciation. Have to get the histogramwidths right though.

richelbilderbeek commented 7 years ago

It has been done.