Closed richelbilderbeek closed 5 years ago
Currently, the pir_plots show model names as used in the R code:
pir_plot
Instead, I'd prefer human-friendly abbreviations.
I suggest to do the same renaming as in e.g. 'Table 11: Evidences of figure 2'. From pirouette_article/scripts/example_5.R I copy-paste:
pirouette_article/scripts/example_5.R
df_evidences$site_model_name <- plyr::revalue(df_evidences$site_model_name, c("JC69" = "JC", "TN93" = "TN")) df_evidences$clock_model_name <- plyr::revalue( df_evidences$clock_model_name, c("strict" = "Strict", "relaxed_log_normal" = "RLN") ) df_evidences$tree_prior_name <- plyr::revalue( df_evidences$tree_prior_name, c( "yule" = "Yule", "birth_death" = "BD", "coalescent_bayesian_skyline" = "CBS", "coalescent_constant_population" = "CCP", "coalescent_exp_population" = "CEP" ) )
Fixed:
Currently, the
pir_plot
s show model names as used in the R code:Instead, I'd prefer human-friendly abbreviations.
I suggest to do the same renaming as in e.g. 'Table 11: Evidences of figure 2'. From
pirouette_article/scripts/example_5.R
I copy-paste: