Closed richelbilderbeek closed 5 years ago
@Giappo: I assign you this Issue, as I think you would enjoy it. No worries about the time: I will re-assign to myself when really needing this :+1:
Mmm, I am afraid I might not get this exactly. Can you show me a simple example?
I think @rsetienne wants this:
Yes :rainbow:
@richelbilderbeek I thought a bit about it. Honestly, even though I completely understand Rampal's argument, I do not believe this is the optimal solution. The looks is not exciting, imho. What if we instead break each figure in twelve squares and we separate generative from best? It will probably suffice to increase the visibility to a decent extent
I asked Rampal and one possible option seems to be to draw only the boundaries, leaving blank the inside of the distributions. I will implement it tomorrow.
This has to be solved in #291
Honestly, even though I completely understand Rampal's argument, I do not believe this is the optimal solution. The looks is not exciting, imho.
Agreed.
What if we instead break each figure in twelve squares and we separate generative from best? It will probably suffice to increase the visibility to a decent extent
Sounds like a plan!
I asked Rampal and one possible option seems to be to draw only the boundaries, leaving blank the inside of the distributions. I will implement it tomorrow.
Cool, good luck :+1:
This is the current state of the figures. @richelbilderbeek if you think the quality is high enough you can close the issue. Otherwise tell me how you would improve them. 🌈
I think those plots look greatawesome!
From @rsetienne: