Closed lmacko closed 11 years ago
Okay, otherwise it's good to go. :+1:
I can't wait to play with it and provide you with little bit more feedback on usability side of things!
document.getElementById
and I've add java doc comments to attributes.I've merged the pull request https://github.com/richfaces/richfaces/pull/46 which was blocking this PR.
We still have a upstream richwidgets problem with the included version of the flot library: https://github.com/richwidgets/richwidgets/issues/20
While not necessarily blocking the Pull Request, we should get it resolved before asking folks to take this component for a test spin.
I've sent pull request fixing the issue.
Merged into master.
Great job, Lukas!
Generally component class Javadoc should be improved to describe carefully what is intension of the tag, which tags it suppose to be combined with. (E.g. You can see
See <x:xaxis />
, etc.)https://github.com/Lukindo/richfaces-sandbox/blob/master/charts/ui/src/main/java/org/richfaces/sandbox/chart/component/AbstractChart.java#L23
Attributes (method) javadoc should be described more verbosely to express their purpose.
title
appear? https://github.com/Lukindo/richfaces-sandbox/blob/master/charts/ui/src/main/java/org/richfaces/sandbox/chart/component/AbstractChart.java#L38Generally one should know what he can expect by using given attribute before he even try.