With the way the pre-processing is written, it seems to corrupt the validation set. The word index is created using data from both the training and validation sets. When test samples come in, they won't have the same treatment. Does anyone else agree?
With the way the pre-processing is written, it seems to corrupt the validation set. The word index is created using data from both the training and validation sets. When test samples come in, they won't have the same treatment. Does anyone else agree?