rickilama54 / smartgwt

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/smartgwt
0 stars 0 forks source link

(TypeError): 'data' is undefined #345

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Uncaught JavaScript exception
[com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptException: (TypeError): 'data' is
undefined
 number: -2146823279
 description: 'data' is undefined
    at com.smartgwt.client.data.DataSource.getFieldNames(Native Method)
    at com.smartgwt.client.data.DataSource.getFieldNames(DataSource.java:2359)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by jaroslav...@gmail.com on 17 Oct 2009 at 12:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Post a standalone test case as the instructions clearly state.

Original comment by sanjiv.j...@gmail.com on 19 Oct 2009 at 7:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Not enough information.

Original comment by sanjiv.j...@gmail.com on 20 Oct 2009 at 1:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
And here we go again...
The report was 2 days old. The "instructions clearly state" such report gets 
rejected
after one week.

You know, I don't care that much, b/c after the project I'm currently on I'm 
done
with SmartGWT for good.
As you can see in the forum I was not the only one who has come across this
particular bug. So when closing such report you should rather think of those 
other
people. (This also 100% applies to the other 2 bugs I have reported & you have 
closed.)

Oh, and watch out, there is one i18n-properties-file from me in the SVN!

Original comment by jaroslav...@gmail.com on 20 Oct 2009 at 2:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
So you did read the instructions and still created an issue with no context, or 
reference to any forum thread, or a 
testcase. You simply posted some stacktrace without taking any effort in 
describing the problem. The issue has 
been rejected because this is not the first time you have done exactly this and 
lazily created an issue with 
insufficient information. 

Best of luck.

Original comment by sanjiv.j...@gmail.com on 20 Oct 2009 at 2:29