Open mkj opened 4 years ago
Hi @mkj I do think you're correct - Receive
is just Actor
. Since this is a change across core code I need to check the overall impact. Will come back to this in the next day or two.
@leenozara what is the current status on this?
The
Msg
associated type ofReceive
trait isn't needed if we require that it's anActor
. It reduces a fair bit of boilerplate. The downside I see is that this forcesReceive
to be anActor
, though is that a problem?This is more of a query than a solid pull request, but it's easier to show code examples here than an issue. There might be reasons why it won't work, of course it breaks compatibility too.