Currently I'm using the weighted adjacency matrix as input to SID but I think the weights are actually ignored. Therefore, I think that it is better to calculate the SID per network and then we can average the SID and the end. Otherwise is just going to be having cycles etc.
Currently I'm using the weighted adjacency matrix as input to SID but I think the weights are actually ignored. Therefore, I think that it is better to calculate the SID per network and then we can average the SID and the end. Otherwise is just going to be having cycles etc.