riparias / rato-occurrences

DwC mapping of RATO vwz occurrences
MIT License
0 stars 1 forks source link

Terms that indicate that a record is an intervention (sampling action, catch) #134

Open PietrH opened 7 months ago

PietrH commented 7 months ago

Strings to look for in the "Actie" field:

check glob: (vang) check glob: (schud)

aantal ?

for Vespa valutina:

Planten

For effort

The record always reflects the current situation, but if you want to know what has changed, you need to look at the previous record(s). So it doesn't show the history, it does show the current situation.

So if you want to know what traps were out when the animal was caught, you need to look at what material was out in the previous record.

If there is a catch in the first record, assume no material was used. (Or material was unknown)

PietrH commented 7 months ago

If it is not an action, it's an observation. It could be an absence, but it's still an observation.

PietrH commented 7 months ago

waarneming is only ever entered once per case, but is repeated per record in a case. So the first record is always an observation, but could also be an intervention.

PietrH commented 7 months ago

The first record doesn't need to be the one where waarneming is filled in, but the first one where it is filled in, is the one that should count as casual observation

If there are records without waarneming, before one is entered, they are administrative steps before the first field visit from RATO.

PietrH commented 7 months ago

For an observation, we need to look at the status field, it should be openstaand_veldwerker or opvolging

If status has any other status, it is an administrative record, that should not be published.

PietrH commented 7 months ago

It's more complicated:

Status in {openstaand_veldwerker, opvolger}{

}else{skip the record}

PietrH commented 7 months ago

It's okay if Planning_uitvoerders is empty, if it remains empty, that's because if it's empty, it's assigned to everyone

PietrH commented 2 weeks ago

We are not receiving this status field I suspect, so we can't use it in this decision tree