Closed jiminoc closed 10 years ago
Could we not include commit: eeed1cce08593074f69c826ab962a7a0a9899c81? When you submitted the last patch I realized that status didn't need to have the [INFO] text and made it a bit cleaner.
Also, it doesn't seem as though this pull request will merge correctly. Can you rebase and ensure it's good to merge?
Thanks!
sure do you want eeedlcc with just the {0} to {3} fix then or you already have that patched to 2.5?
It seems like it's already patched here: https://github.com/riptano/ComboAMI/blob/2.5/ds2_configure.py#L445
I believe I took your commit and pushed the changes to both branches at the time.
closing this one, opened a new clean one from the company fork
--email and --raidonly had the same descriptions in the comments
the 0 index was duplicated for the reflector status message
need a try/catch around the userdata call as that data isn't available in a VPC and throws a 404