search

riscv-admin / dev-partners

This repo is for tracking of RISC-V Development Partners Activities
3 stars 0 forks source link

Packed SIMD gcc, binutils #22

Open jjscheel opened 1 year ago

jjscheel commented 1 year ago

Technical Group

Packed SIMD Task Group tech-p-ext

ratification-pkg

Packed SIMD

Technical Liaison

Kevin Chen

Task Category

Compilers/Toolchain

Task Sub Category

Ratification Target

1Q2025

Statement of Work (SOW)

Component names:

Requirements: (prose describing what has to be done and what the end result is)

Deliverables:

Accepted PRs to the upstream communities for each of the components:

Acceptance Criteria:

Projected timeframe: (best guess date)

SOW Signoffs: (delete those not needed)

Waiver

Pull Request Details

No response

lazyparser commented 1 year ago

@pz9115 and @ChunyuLiao may provide more info on this area.

pz9115 commented 9 months ago

We had already updated porting the Packed SIMD gcc into GCC13 in downstream repo, https://github.com/plctlab/riscv-gcc/tree/gcc13-p-rebase porting Binutils into 2.41 is WIP.

jjscheel commented 9 months ago

Good to know. Thanks.

But the spec hasn't even been reviewed internally and thus may change!

ChunyuLiao commented 9 months ago

llvm has some patches under review, but are not active. [RISCV] Implement the MC layer support of P extension https://reviews.llvm.org/D95588 [RISCV] Support experimental 'P' extension 0.9.11 https://reviews.llvm.org/D108189 [RISCV] Implement intrinsics for P extension https://reviews.llvm.org/D99158 [RISCV] Add vector types to GPR for P extension and explict type to existing codegen patterns https://reviews.llvm.org/D100288 [RISCV] Support Zbpbo extension v0.9.11 https://reviews.llvm.org/D128604

pz9115 commented 9 months ago

P-ext TG has been active recently， discussing some instruction design in the community, waiting for their update.

https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-p-ext/topic/102843596#268

jjscheel commented 9 months ago

Good to know. However, any work before Architecture Review completes may need to be re-done. I'm going to leave in "Blocked" state, but please do any work which you deem reasonable given the risk.

pz9115 commented 9 months ago

Agree!

jjscheel commented 9 months ago

I reached out to the P-Ext Chair and they will indeed need help with toolchain. I need to get them enabled. Work is on my end.

pz9115 commented 7 months ago

John Hauser sent a new version draft specification for Packed SIMD, still wait it move into a stable specification，maybe need take a few month.

https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-p-ext/message/291

jjscheel commented 5 months ago

Specification work continues by John Hauser.

jjscheel commented 1 month ago

@fuhle044, please see the first entry for the issue (this is our SOW) and propose new text (as a comment) for the Requirements, Deliverables, and Acceptance Criteria sections.

jjscheel commented 1 month ago

@lazyparser, am I correct in assuming you plan on working on LLVM too? Are there any other pieces besides these 3?

fuhle044 commented 1 month ago

Yes, LLVM will be included.

-rich

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024, 8:20 AM Jeff Scheel @.***> wrote:

@lazyparser https://github.com/lazyparser, am I correct in assuming you plan on working on LLVM too? Are there any other pieces besides these 3?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/riscv-admin/dev-partners/issues/22#issuecomment-2248287890, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOB2QNVONEGH6NJFXDRN7ALZN7A23AVCNFSM6AAAAAAV6T6MHKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDENBYGI4DOOBZGA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

pz9115 commented 1 month ago

We have a SOW here, and need Rich help to add the P spec link that need to be implement.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dCnLq8eSgOnD-bYrembB5aU4IVejn2q4OSJceVRIJpU/edit?usp=sharing

jjscheel commented 1 month ago

@pz9115, @fuhle044, I have taken the SOW information and put it into the first entry above SOW. Please review and provide any comments.

jjscheel commented 1 month ago

@lazyparser please see my previous comments about the SOW. I'd appreciate your feedback as well.

pz9115 commented 3 weeks ago

We found a draft doc here https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-p-ext/files/Drafts/RVP-baseInstrs-A-010.pdf, but it still need add encoding and some instructions descriptions to make sure we can implement it clear in toolchain part.

jjscheel commented 3 weeks ago

I have requested specification changes in an email to the TG: https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-p-ext/topic/specification_details/108017701