riscv-admin / riscv-getting-started-guide

RISC-V Getting Started Guide
Apache License 2.0
1 stars 1 forks source link

New name for getting started guide #2

Open kersten1 opened 2 months ago

kersten1 commented 2 months ago

Create a new name for getting started guide. New member guide?

jjscheel commented 2 months ago

A couple options come to mind:

  1. New Member Getting Started Guide
  2. New Member Guide
  3. Technical Member On-boarding Guide
  4. Technical Member Getting Started Guide

Any thoughts here?

BTW, we're exploring a new name because there historically have been several "Getting Started Guides" and when migrating this doc, we might as well clean up the name.

kersten1 commented 2 months ago

@jjscheel I like "New member guide". How much input do we need for this decision?

jjscheel commented 2 months ago

42

kersten1 commented 2 months ago

Technical member on-boarding guide it is then...

jjscheel commented 2 months ago

@rpsene likes names. Perhaps his insight would be good?

wmat commented 2 months ago

I like "New Member Guide" personally. Or even just "Member Guide" so as not to dissuade old members from looking at it.

On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 8:04 AM Jeff Scheel @.***> wrote:

@rpsene https://github.com/rpsene likes names. Perhaps his insight would be good?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/riscv-admin/riscv-getting-started-guide/issues/2#issuecomment-2273308704, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAN6ZEUWSKKQ7DRCVGNE6DZQIELBAVCNFSM6AAAAABLY57LGSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDENZTGMYDQNZQGQ . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.*** com>

kersten1 commented 1 month ago

RISC-V Technical Member Guide

rpsene commented 1 month ago

@kersten1 what kind of getting started are we promoting?

kersten1 commented 1 month ago

@rpsene This is the onboarding guide that we have for the technical members. Trying to come up with different name rather than using Getting started or onboarding. Because the guide is useful to existing members as well and should be used as a reference for all.

jjscheel commented 1 month ago

I generally like New Member Guide name BUT would like to add something to describe that it's for engagement. Perhaps we call it the New Member Guide for Technical Collaboration?

kersten1 commented 1 month ago

That is a mouthful! I do like Bill's point about dropping the "new" though. It should be considered a reference for technical collaboration, IMHO. However, I will of course cave on this one. Also need to consider what the short name will be - Member Guide? Are there other member guides out there to be aware of?

rpsene commented 1 month ago

Looks like we have an opportunity to create something considering Ops, Tech and Markerting/Market.

jjscheel commented 1 month ago

There was another "Getting Started Guide" we've since renamed to something very specific...

kersten1 commented 1 week ago

making a judge's ruling here and going with "Member's Guide for Technical Collaboration"