Closed jhauser-us closed 1 week ago
You are right. I think this is a place holder for any property to be defined under rscv- namespace. The DSD guide (https://github.com/UEFI/DSD-Guide/blob/main/src/dsd-guide.adoc#appendix-c-known-device-property-prefixes) allows to use vendor ACPI ID as the prefix for the property but vendor needs to manage those properties. For RISC-V, ACPI ID registered is RSCV. Hence, any one in future wants to define and use a new property under rscv- namespace, should register here first. I think that is the idea to have this section.
We had some properties here initially, then - we didn't. Nevertheless, it makes sense to stake a claim to the rscv- namespace now.
Marking this as won't fix given last two comments. If you're okay with that, please close the ticket @jhauser-us.
The right response is not to leave the document making an obviously false statement. If you want to stake the claim to the rscv-
namespace, then change the text to say that.
Section 6.3, "RVI-specific ACPI Device Properties", says, "This section defines the
_DSD
device properties in therscv-
namespace." However, the only properties actually mentioned in this section are for UART devices, and if I'm not mistaken, these are not defined in therscv-
namespace. (Right?)In short, I believe this section says it defines properties in the
rscv-
namespace but then doesn't do so.