Open oferShinaar opened 1 month ago
I think nobody is working on this. So, a PR would be appreciated!
Just a note to ensure we're all on the same page. The linked commit defines __builtin_riscv_*
functions which so far have been considered out of the scope of this document (though I think we typically try to match what gcc does in LLVM). So if it's desirable, perhaps the path forward is to define a __riscv_*
intrinsic that could be standardised.
(Christoph / Kito / ... - please correct me if wrong!)
Yes, I was expecting to get a PR that would follow the naming convention in the document. Thanks for stating this clearly!
Just a note to ensure we're all on the same page. The linked commit defines builtinriscv* functions which so far have been considered out of the scope of this document (though I think we typically try to match what gcc does in LLVM). So if it's desirable, perhaps the path forward is to define a riscv_* intrinsic that could be standardised.
Thanks my expectation as well :)
Just a note to ensure we're all on the same page. The linked commit defines
__builtin_riscv_*
functions which so far have been considered out of the scope of this document (though I think we typically try to match what gcc does in LLVM). So if it's desirable, perhaps the path forward is to define a__riscv_*
intrinsic that could be standardised.(Christoph / Kito / ... - please correct me if wrong!)
Might you know if those intrinsics are a wip in LLVM? There seems to be only assembly support for Zicbom
, and I couldn't find a PR or issue regarding implementing these.
Might you know if those intrinsics are a wip in LLVM? There seems to be only assembly support for
Zicbom
, and I couldn't find a PR or issue regarding implementing these.
Nobody's posted a PR to my knowledge, and I'm not aware of anyone working on them so far. Patches welcome!
Is there a plan to add cbo Intrinsic to the doc