Closed pathakraul closed 2 weeks ago
Yes, would you like to submit the PR? Otherwise the service names improvement across the spec is already an AI and due.
The service 'get fast channel addr' should have another request data of 'service id'. We would not able to obtain whether the respond of fast channel details belongs to get/set level/limit.
The service 'get fast channel addr' should have another request data of 'service id'. We would not able to obtain whether the respond of fast channel details belongs to get/set level/limit.
Fixed in commit https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-rpmi/commit/7f338d537b27c20f38453a356259e23458fe8f65
For the services name, can we remove redundant name "DEVICE_POWER" as it belongs to service group with the name.
GET_DEVICE_POWER_DOMAIN_ATTRIBUTES -> GET_NUM_DOMAINS GET_DEVICE_POWER_DOMAIN_ATTRIBUTES -> GET_DOMAIN_ATTRIBUTES SET_DEVICE_POWER_DOMAIN_STATE -> SET_DOMAIN_STATE GET_DEVICE_POWER_DOMAIN_STATE -> GET_DOMAIN_STATE