Closed jb-brelot-nxp closed 1 month ago
Hi All,
I have open this issue following our discussion but now I m not sure that it make sense.
Having just smclic and still having S mode is a valid option. We need to consider that the ssclic will bring the Mode bit inside clicinattr whcih will be potentially 1 bit per IRQ line if we are making mandatory the ssclic .
This could have a huge impact and can be complex to justify in some situation.
I m happy to force that ssclic can be present only if smclic is , but I won t bring any other relation between ssclic and smclic,
Please comment. If you disagree.
Otherwise I will close the issue during the next meeting.
The ssclic extension depends on the smclic extension.
This sentence needs to be replhrased.
Make Ssclic mandatory if smclic is implemented and S mode is implemented.