Closed kumarsankaran closed 3 years ago
Hi, the committed text does not define the RAS acronym anywhere. It should be added to the terminology table at least.
Hi Mitchell,
Good catch. Yes, the RAS abbreviation should be expanded out in the spec. Will send an update shortly.
Regards
Kumar
From: Mitchell Horne @.> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2021 1:25 PM To: riscv/riscv-platform-specs @.> Cc: Kumar Sankaran @.>; State change < @.> Subject: Re: [riscv/riscv-platform-specs] RAS features for OS-A platform server extension and removal of unneeded sections in the spec (#23)
Hi, the committed text does not define the RAS acronym anywhere. It should be added to the terminology table at least.
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs/pull/23#issuecomment-868814807, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABLRGVT3VVRYVOUJXPOK3I3TUTQZTANCNFSM47IYYWPQ .
Merged