search

rishabht1 / damnvid

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/damnvid
GNU General Public License v3.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

RPM's need better packaging #38

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Download the 32-bit or 64-bit RPM package of DamnVid
2. Try to install it on Fedora
3. Witness that if ails to install

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I expect to be able to install DamnVid. I see an error message instead.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by windypo...@gmail.com on 24 Dec 2009 at 11:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
*"fails to install" not "ails to install".

Original comment by windypo...@gmail.com on 24 Dec 2009 at 11:51

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I get this on F12 x64:

rpm -i damnvid-1.5-1.amd64.rpm 
error: Failed dependencies:
    libc.so.6(GLIBC_PRIVATE)(64bit) is needed by damnvid-1.5-1.amd64

I installed also glibc.i686 0:2.11.1-1. 

ll /lib/glibc.so.6 gives:
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 14 2010-04-09 22:39 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.11.1.so

Original comment by blueskyn...@gmail.com on 9 Apr 2010 at 8:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Yeah, that's pretty much what I got when I tried it in Fedora.
Do you know anything about proper RPM packaging?

Original comment by windypo...@gmail.com on 9 Apr 2010 at 9:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
"Do you know anything about proper RPM packaging?"

Unfortunately, no.

Original comment by blueskyn...@gmail.com on 10 Apr 2010 at 9:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Have you tried using alien on the Ubuntu debs?

Original comment by anot...@gmail.com on 27 May 2010 at 8:19