codecov[bot]
commented
4 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 55.74%. Comparing base (
04b2391) to head (1b00249).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #663 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 55.74% 55.74% ======================================= Files 38 38 Lines 6480 6480 ======================================= Hits 3612 3612 Misses 2755 2755 Partials 113 113 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/risingwavelabs/risingwave-operator/pull/663/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=risingwavelabs) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/risingwavelabs/risingwave-operator/pull/663/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=risingwavelabs) | `55.74% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=risingwavelabs#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
arkbriar
BugenZhao
What's changed and what's your intention?
See https://github.com/risingwavelabs/risingwave/issues/16693 for the background.
TL;DR: As we cannot guarantee there's no (unexpected) synchronous I/O call within the asynchronous context in kernel's Rust code, increasing the worker threads number can reduce the possibility of the process being blocked, especially for the free-tier standalone deployment with CPU limit set to 1.
Checklist
Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)