Open BugenZhao opened 10 months ago
So maybe we should remove consumer_group from properties to avoid confusion.
We've removed the group.id
from the dev doc to avoid unexpected behavior.
Users may want to customize it to be
consumer_
or something else.
I am afraid of bringing up more confusion for normal users that we have to explain how RW uses the low-level API and how splits are distributed to different actors. group.id
is required by the kafka client but we don't necessarily need it.
This issue has been open for 60 days with no activity. Could you please update the status? Feel free to continue discussion or close as not planned.
Currently we hardcode it to be
consumer-
. Users may want to customize it to beconsumer_
or something else.https://github.com/risingwavelabs/risingwave/blob/e723f6a66ea9b02b79efed40306bb6317006c1ae/src/connector/src/source/kafka/source/reader.rs#L79-L90
Note that specifying the whole group id is not expected as described in https://github.com/risingwavelabs/risingwave/pull/13223#issuecomment-1791798953. So maybe we should remove
consumer_group
from properties to avoid confusion.cc @shanicky @tabVersion