Closed arigaud closed 7 years ago
Hi Alexandre,
many thanks again.
I'm curious why do you need to exclude synchronization check for the cluster check?
BR Oliver
Hi Oliver !
I knew this what going to provoke your curiosity 😁
So we manage several hundred fw on my company. For 5 of them Sync status is unsynchronized (oid result) but all checks commands are ok.
We have opened a technical support request.
Interesting..even recalculating the checksum didnt solve the issue?
But in any case, thanks again for the contribution.
Am 07.07.2017 20:30 schrieb "Alexandre Rigaud" notifications@github.com:
Hi Oliver !
I knew this what going to provoke your curiosity 😁
So we manage several hundred fw on my company. For 5 of them Sync status is unsynchronized (oid result) but all checks commands are ok.
We have opened a technical support request.
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/riskersen/Monitoring/pull/38#issuecomment-313759236, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH7uzCfw3WEhoHZRaaWjCwbGX7MEoXUpks5sLnljgaJpZM4OHxAC .
Nope oid result indicate master Sync is ok but not for the slave.
Global checksum we Can see on oid .15 are similar (master/slave).
All confs are the same, support maybe help us
Just because selected types of device are available only when reading source code
Perhaps they have their place in help mode too.