search

rism-ch / rism-maintenance

A repository for tracking data maintenance tasks
0 stars 0 forks source link

Diff CH-bib-records in Big Muscat and in CH-Muscat #17

Closed baccia closed 4 years ago

baccia commented 5 years ago

@xhero List differences between CH-bib-records in Big Muscat (corrected by ZR) and CH-bib-records in CH-Muscat. @baccia Check by hand if there are corrections by ZR that might be automatically updated in CH-Muscat, or fields that should systematically be kept from the Big Muscat record when migrating (e.g., perhaps 300?) When migrating, keep any fields that were added by ZR (e.g., additional 700s that are not in the CH-Muscat record)

baccia commented 5 years ago

Related issue: Check character encoding errors in old CH-bib-records: e.g., "Ü" is rendered as "ö" in CH-Muscat, and is correct in Big Muscat cf. 245 in http://www.rism-ch.org/admin/sources/400102457 https://muscat.rism.info/admin/sources/400102457

xhero commented 5 years ago

Is this a recurring issue? Or could it be something corrected in ZR?

baccia commented 5 years ago

Up to now (first day of work, 130 records checked out of 3900) I have spotted only Ü/ö.

baccia commented 5 years ago

Another character encoding error: "à" is rendered as "á" in CH-Muscat, but is correct in Big Muscat cf. 245 in http://www.rism-ch.org/admin/sources/400104947 https://muscat.rism.info/admin/sources/400104947

baccia commented 5 years ago

Both character encoding errors are systematically recurring, as far as I could see - i.e., in all old CH-Muscat records "à" is rendered "á" and "Ü" is rendered "ö".