search

rism-digital / muscat

🗂️ A Rails application for the inventory of handwritten and printed music scores
http://muscat-project.org
34 stars 16 forks source link

Add subfield $p to 690 for indicating the part or movement number #1565

Open lpugin opened 5 months ago

lpugin commented 5 months ago

Currently, references to single movements of a work in the 690 are to be added with a /x in 690$n. The guidelines read

If the source contains only one movement of a work, indicate the number of the movement after a slash.

See for example KV 425/3 in https://muscat.rism.info/admin/sources/450201735

The information would be better structured with two subfield, namely $n for the work number, and $p for the part or movement of the work.

This is an internal field and changing it would have no impact on the interoperability of the data. The display can be kept the same, but it would make links with works much better structured.

xhero commented 5 months ago

Do some statistics on this field

alexandermarxen commented 5 months ago

Just a reminder: Some catalogues such as GWV use the slash as a genuine component of the citation Example: https://muscat.rism.info/admin/sources/450006566

MFalletta commented 5 months ago

And BPI we cite without slash acoording to the catalogue. Examples: https://muscat.rism.info/admin/sources/990056940 (S=Sinfonia) or https://muscat.rism.info/admin/sources/452506787 (Aria from the 1st act)