Open miguel-nascimento opened 5 days ago
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
Name | Status | Preview | Comments | Updated (UTC) |
---|---|---|---|---|
river-sample-app | ✅ Ready (Inspect) | Visit Preview | 💬 Add feedback | Nov 20, 2024 10:31pm |
are you sure these tests are passing, the multinode_ent all have error messages and yellow checks. Is a yellow check a pass?
✓ member.test.ts - queue update > queue update metadata 4247ms
stderr | src/sync-agent/spaces/spaces.test.multi.ts > spaces.test.ts > create/leave/join space
AggregateError:
at internalConnectMultiple (node:net:1118:18)
at afterConnectMultiple (node:net:1685:7) {
code: 'ECONNREFUSED',
[errors]: [
Error: connect ECONNREFUSED ::1:3000
at createConnectionError (node:net:1648:14)
at afterConnectMultiple (node:net:1678:16) {
errno: -111,
code: 'ECONNREFUSED',
syscall: 'connect',
address: '::1',
port: 3000
},
Error: connect ECONNREFUSED 127.0.0.1:3000
at createConnectionError (node:net:1648:14)
at afterConnectMultiple (node:net:1678:16) {
errno: -111,
code: 'ECONNREFUSED',
syscall: 'connect',
address: '127.0.0.1',
port: 3000
}
]
}
looks like vitest just prints errors and warnings, probably a good thing! we should fix errors and warnings. Did you confirm that the number of tests executed is the same as a non vitest pr? i.e.:
Test Files 35 passed | 1 skipped (36)
Tests 178 passed | 2 skipped (180)
@sergekh2 suggested the folder option for tests. I'm actually fine with it if we just put a tests folder so that it's tests/<unit/multi/multi_ne/multi_v2>
etc... i think that makes way more sense.
Multinode > Run SDK Tests (without entitlements)
Jest
Test Suites: 42 passed, 42 of 71 total
Tests: 1 skipped, 190 passed, 191 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 443.342 s
Ran all test suites.
Vitest:
Test Files 35 passed | 1 skipped (36)
Tests 178 passed | 2 skipped (180)
Start at 22:30:00
Duration 168.93s (transform 1.85s, setup 1.21s, collect 36.05s, tests 843.55s, environment 12.01s, prepare 2.87s)
There are 7 tests suite missing update: those tests are running in unit tests instead of multi
Multinode Ent > Run SDK Tests (with entitlements)
Jest
Test Suites: 23 passed, 23 of 71 total
Tests: 123 passed, 123 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 1085.794 s
Vitest
Test Files 25 passed (25)
Tests 130 passed (130)
Start at 22:32:49
Duration 774.43s (transform 1.82s, setup 727ms, collect 27.61s, tests 1744.49s, environment 7.95s, prepare 1.68s)
I'll check what are the tests that vitest is running ahead.
Multinode Ent Legacy > Run River Tests against Legacy Spaces
Jest
Test Suites: 20 passed, 20 of 71 total
Tests: 104 passed, 104 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 1068.463 s
Vitest
Test Files 22 passed (22)
Tests 111 passed (111)
Start at 22:32:58
Duration 773.21s (transform 1.94s, setup 772ms, collect 27.66s, tests 1417.47s, environment 7.37s, prepare 1.65s)
I'll check what are the tests that vitest is running ahead.
I'm breaking #1462 into small PRs
Moving the sdk package from jest to vitest.
Why:
my-jest
and--experimental-vm-modules
Most changes of this PR includes:
.toResolve()
->.resolves.not.toThrow()
.toReject()
->.rejects.toThrow()
.toBeTrue()
->.toBe(true)
.toBeFalse()
->.toBe(false)
test (inside describe)
->it
jsdom
->happy-dom
util.test.ts
->test-utils.ts
Vitest doesn't support test groups. We're managing test suites based on the filename
<name>.test.ts
@group main
<name>.test.multi_ne.ts
@group with-entitlements
<name>.test.multi.ts
@group with-v2-entitlements
<name>.test.multi.v2.ts
Alternative: Filename gets longer with the filename test suite management We could filter tests by the test name pattern
describe('unit/...)
@group main
describe('multi_ne/...)
@group with-entitlements
describe('multi/...)
@group with-v2-entitlements
describe('multi_v2/...)
What do you guys think?