Open rivergillis opened 2 years ago
Looks to be related to https://github.com/thollander/actions-comment-pull-request/issues/30, perhaps since I had to rebase on someone elses fork?
If so, seems like a non-issue. Will verify with the next PR
Might depend on who has caused the workflow to run - with it only running fine when it’s the repo owner.
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#workflow_run
probably need to have workflow 1 store the tree (& PR id) as an artefact then use another workflow (triggered via workflow_run
to download that artefact & do the comment) - sort of similar to the last example on that link
See https://github.com/rivergillis/update-pocket/actions/runs/3153160059/jobs/5129295509 for an example of a failure job, integration was added in #10