Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by jlmise...@gmail.com
on 7 Mar 2010 at 8:18
Original comment by cedric.m...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2010 at 8:36
i'll have to check that.
if they were there before, I don't understand, I'll have to check, otherwise
it's
normal as the updates have not been loaded yet (and I currently haven't got the
time
to work on the updates)
Original comment by jaykay...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2010 at 9:29
it's bizarre, this data is defined as an address tag on a way rather than a
node. we
only loaded nodes. is this valid ??
Original comment by jaykay...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2010 at 9:39
Attachments:
That's exactly one of the key points.
OSM allows addresses to be captured not only as nodes or ranges, but also as
property
of a building.
It would be great to be able to catch these as well... although I understand it
makes
the whole process much more complicated.
Original comment by jlmise...@gmail.com
on 12 Mar 2010 at 7:53
after having imported the whole datafile (4GB) again, having build lines and
polygons
and calculated centroids, i got a lot more points, but still not those on your
capture,
i'll have to try to understand why i miss them ..
Original comment by jaykay...@gmail.com
on 16 Mar 2010 at 11:18
Solved with new import !
Original comment by cedric.m...@gmail.com
on 19 Mar 2010 at 11:47
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jlmise...@gmail.com
on 7 Mar 2010 at 8:17Attachments: