rizwan3d / noto

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/noto
1 stars 0 forks source link

The position of the full-width comma (,) in T-Chinese deviates. #54

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Marking this punctuation (,) in the centre of the full-width space is the 
standard form in the world of Traditional Chinese. However, the comma now 
launched in the Noto Sans T-Chinese goes upward, which is  'weird' and does not 
comply with the standard of the language.

I suggest the problem be solved immediately because the users in Taiwan and 
Hong Kong, Macao can find the problem when using the font by intuition. And 
this will lead to the bad reputation to this project. (Comma is one of the most 
basic characters in any language; yet only T-Chinese mode does not provide a 
correct type.)

I hereby sincerely hope the new update for this problem can be launched soon on 
the website! Thank you for your efforts in providing the font for the globe!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by tch0...@gmail.com on 16 Jul 2014 at 3:41

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by roozbeh@google.com on 16 Jul 2014 at 6:08

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Issue 36 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by roozbeh@google.com on 16 Jul 2014 at 6:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I noticed the same problem. The position of punctuation marks (、,。) are 
not in right positions.

Original comment by gloo...@gmail.com on 17 Jul 2014 at 3:26

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
正(繁)體中文的標點符號都是位於各自的正中間,不論逗��
�、句號、頓號都是。可參考維基百科的條目。
台灣教育部就是這樣規定,因此有問題的是逗號的位置,太��
�上了。

Original comment by tch0...@gmail.com on 18 Jul 2014 at 4:34

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I am sorry that I have to say that the standard Traditional Chinese 
punctuations of comma, period are located in the centre, so the '、' and '。' 
are correct!

Don't use the standard of China to unify the standard of Taiwan, Hong Kong and 
Macao.

Original comment by tch0...@gmail.com on 18 Jul 2014 at 4:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The issue with the Traditional Chinese form of U+FF0C was found a couple of 
days before the public release, but it was too late to fix it. The first update 
will address this issue. And yes, the Traditional Chinese forms of U+3001 and 
U+3002 (and U+FF0E) are correct.

Original comment by ken.lu...@gmail.com on 22 Jul 2014 at 8:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by xian...@google.com on 5 Sep 2014 at 9:14