Closed davidpeterson closed 9 years ago
A workround for authors is to use [
instead of [
.
This is not really the reason why txtmark
is that much faster :D
But, yes, I do not perform real HTML tree parsing. Also, using the <pre>
tag when there's built-in markdown functionality to achieve this is kinda the wrong use case.
If there's really, really the need to support and sanitize <pre>
tags, I may add this a an optional feature, closing this for now as 'out-of-scope'.
Link references are being processed in the wrong place. The following Markdown:
Is converted into this:
When it should be:
This may explain why your Markdown parser is faster than others!