search

rjmurillo / EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers

Many of the recommendations in the book Effective C#: 50 Specific Ways to Improve Your C# can be validated by Roslyn-based analyzers and code fixes.
MIT License
2 stars 1 forks source link

Update RunPerfTests.ps1 to enable roll-forward #65

Closed rjmurillo closed 1 month ago

rjmurillo commented 1 month ago

Enhanced performance testing flexibility by allowing the .NET runtime to select compatible framework versions with the addition of the --roll-forward Major option.

Fixes #64

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies a PowerShell script used for running performance tests by adding the --roll-forward Major option to the command-line arguments. This change aims to enhance the flexibility of the testing process by allowing the .NET runtime to select a compatible framework version if the specified one is unavailable. The other command parameters remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
build/scripts/perf/RunPerfTests.ps1 Modified command-line arguments to include --roll-forward Major for improved framework version compatibility.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
When changing .NET versions in global.json, performance suite may not run on historical snapshot (#64) ✅

[!TIP]

Announcements - The review status is no longer posted as a separate comment when there are no actionable or nitpick comments. In such cases, the review status is included in the walkthrough comment. - We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the [discussion post](https://discordapp.com/channels/1134356397673414807/1279579842131787838) on our Discord. - Possibly related PRs: Walkthrough comment now includes a list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context. Please share any feedback in the [discussion post](https://discordapp.com/channels/1134356397673414807/1282535539299323995) on our Discord. - Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs in the walkthrough comment. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file. - Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).
Recent review details **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: ASSERTIVE**
Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 07db1f93025c48c25e3d2cda5835cdffa82d0258 and f90ff66762654bb5d03b6c14c994677c5bfe7c7b.
Files selected for processing (1) * build/scripts/perf/RunPerfTests.ps1 (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
build/scripts/perf/RunPerfTests.ps1 (1)
`18-18`: **LGTM!** The code change looks good: - It adds the `--roll-forward Major` option to the `dotnet run` command arguments, which is consistent with the PR objectives and summary. - This option allows the .NET runtime to select a compatible framework version if the specified one is unavailable, enhancing the flexibility of the testing process. - The rest of the command arguments remain unchanged. - The change is small, focused, and does not introduce any obvious issues or side effects.
--- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
codacy-production[bot] commented 1 month ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%) :white_check_mark: ∅
Coverage variation details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (07db1f93025c48c25e3d2cda5835cdffa82d0258) | 948 | 838 | 88.40% | | | Head commit (f90ff66762654bb5d03b6c14c994677c5bfe7c7b) | 948 (+0) | 838 (+0) | 88.40% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `
Diff coverage details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#65) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more