Closed rjmurillo closed 4 weeks ago
The pull request includes updates to three files: baseline.json
, AnalyzerReleases.Shipped.md
, and AnalyzerReleases.Unshipped.md
. The baseline.json
file has an updated SHA identifier for the release version. The AnalyzerReleases.Shipped.md
file introduces a new release section that adds two analyzer rules, ECS1200 and ECS1300. Conversely, the AnalyzerReleases.Unshipped.md
file removes entries for the same two rules, indicating that they are no longer part of the unshipped releases documentation.
File(s) | Change Summary |
---|---|
build/perf/baseline.json | Updated SHA identifier from 75e6c1b724be72db803fef4ebc99f07bdee4bf61 to 9144e7c2240d02021734e67795adc2f4096d15ce . |
src/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/AnalyzerReleases.Shipped.md | Added new release section 0.2.0 with two new analyzer rules: ECS1200 and ECS1300. |
src/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/AnalyzerReleases.Unshipped.md | Removed entries for analyzer rules ECS1200 and ECS1300. |
build/perf/baseline.json (1)
`4-4`: **LGTM! Verify the new SHA.** The update to the SHA value aligns with the PR objective of updating the performance baseline commitid. The JSON structure remains valid after this change. To ensure the new SHA corresponds to an actual commit in the repository, please run the following script:✅ Verification successful
**SHA Validation Passed** The new SHA value `9144e7c2240d02021734e67795adc2f4096d15ce` exists in the repository and aligns with the PR objective of updating the performance baseline commit ID. The JSON structure remains valid after this change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the new SHA exists in the repository # Test: Check if the new SHA exists in the git history if git rev-parse --quiet --verify 9144e7c2240d02021734e67795adc2f4096d15ce^{commit}; then echo "SHA 9144e7c2240d02021734e67795adc2f4096d15ce exists in the repository." else echo "SHA 9144e7c2240d02021734e67795adc2f4096d15ce does not exist in the repository." fi ``` Length of output: 276src/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/AnalyzerReleases.Shipped.md (2)
`17-25`: **LGTM: New release section is well-structured and consistent.** The new release section (0.2.0) follows the established format and structure of the existing content. The rule IDs, categories, severity levels, and notes are correctly provided for both new rules (ECS1200 and ECS1300). --- `24-25`: **Verify the documentation links for the new rules.** Please ensure that the documentation links for the new rules (ECS1200 and ECS1300) are correct and accessible. Run the following script to verify the documentation links: If the script outputs the filenames (ECS1200.md and ECS1300.md) without any errors, the links are valid and accessible.✅ Verification successful
**Documentation links are valid and accessible.** All provided documentation links for ECS1200 and ECS1300 are correct and accessible.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the documentation links for the new rules. # Test: Check if the documentation links are accessible. echo "Checking documentation link for ECS1200..." gh api repos/rjmurillo/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/contents/docs/rules/ECS1200.md --jq .name echo "Checking documentation link for ECS1300..." gh api repos/rjmurillo/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/contents/docs/rules/ECS1300.md --jq .name ``` Length of output: 397
Coverage variation | Diff coverage |
---|---|
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%) | :white_check_mark: ∅ |
Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more
Changes