rjmurillo / EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers

Many of the recommendations in the book Effective C#: 50 Specific Ways to Improve Your C# can be validated by Roslyn-based analyzers and code fixes.
MIT License
2 stars 1 forks source link

Move unshipped rules docs to shipped and update performance baseline commitid #69

Closed rjmurillo closed 4 weeks ago

rjmurillo commented 4 weeks ago

Changes

coderabbitai[bot] commented 4 weeks ago

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to three files: baseline.json, AnalyzerReleases.Shipped.md, and AnalyzerReleases.Unshipped.md. The baseline.json file has an updated SHA identifier for the release version. The AnalyzerReleases.Shipped.md file introduces a new release section that adds two analyzer rules, ECS1200 and ECS1300. Conversely, the AnalyzerReleases.Unshipped.md file removes entries for the same two rules, indicating that they are no longer part of the unshipped releases documentation.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
build/perf/baseline.json Updated SHA identifier from 75e6c1b724be72db803fef4ebc99f07bdee4bf61 to 9144e7c2240d02021734e67795adc2f4096d15ce.
src/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/AnalyzerReleases.Shipped.md Added new release section 0.2.0 with two new analyzer rules: ECS1200 and ECS1300.
src/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/AnalyzerReleases.Unshipped.md Removed entries for analyzer rules ECS1200 and ECS1300.

📜 Recent review details **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: ASSERTIVE**
📥 Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9144e7c2240d02021734e67795adc2f4096d15ce and e03b382843b30e11a5979b1d94d78dcd69590212.
📒 Files selected for processing (3) * build/perf/baseline.json (1 hunks) * src/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/AnalyzerReleases.Shipped.md (1 hunks) * src/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/AnalyzerReleases.Unshipped.md (0 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1) * src/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/AnalyzerReleases.Unshipped.md
🔇 Additional comments (3)
build/perf/baseline.json (1)
`4-4`: **LGTM! Verify the new SHA.** The update to the SHA value aligns with the PR objective of updating the performance baseline commitid. The JSON structure remains valid after this change. To ensure the new SHA corresponds to an actual commit in the repository, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful **SHA Validation Passed** The new SHA value `9144e7c2240d02021734e67795adc2f4096d15ce` exists in the repository and aligns with the PR objective of updating the performance baseline commit ID. The JSON structure remains valid after this change.
🏁 Scripts executed The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the new SHA exists in the repository # Test: Check if the new SHA exists in the git history if git rev-parse --quiet --verify 9144e7c2240d02021734e67795adc2f4096d15ce^{commit}; then echo "SHA 9144e7c2240d02021734e67795adc2f4096d15ce exists in the repository." else echo "SHA 9144e7c2240d02021734e67795adc2f4096d15ce does not exist in the repository." fi ``` Length of output: 276
src/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/AnalyzerReleases.Shipped.md (2)
`17-25`: **LGTM: New release section is well-structured and consistent.** The new release section (0.2.0) follows the established format and structure of the existing content. The rule IDs, categories, severity levels, and notes are correctly provided for both new rules (ECS1200 and ECS1300). --- `24-25`: **Verify the documentation links for the new rules.** Please ensure that the documentation links for the new rules (ECS1200 and ECS1300) are correct and accessible. Run the following script to verify the documentation links: If the script outputs the filenames (ECS1200.md and ECS1300.md) without any errors, the links are valid and accessible.
✅ Verification successful **Documentation links are valid and accessible.** All provided documentation links for ECS1200 and ECS1300 are correct and accessible.
🏁 Scripts executed The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the documentation links for the new rules. # Test: Check if the documentation links are accessible. echo "Checking documentation link for ECS1200..." gh api repos/rjmurillo/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/contents/docs/rules/ECS1200.md --jq .name echo "Checking documentation link for ECS1300..." gh api repos/rjmurillo/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/contents/docs/rules/ECS1300.md --jq .name ``` Length of output: 397
--- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
❤️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
codacy-production[bot] commented 4 weeks ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%) :white_check_mark:
Coverage variation details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (9144e7c2240d02021734e67795adc2f4096d15ce) | 1250 | 1093 | 87.44% | | | Head commit (e03b382843b30e11a5979b1d94d78dcd69590212) | 1250 (+0) | 1093 (+0) | 87.44% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `
Diff coverage details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#69) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more