Add Item 14: Minimize initialization logic

rjmurillo commented 4 weeks ago

This pull request introduces a new Roslyn analyzer to enforce best practices for C# constructors. The analyzer identifies cases where a constructor contains duplicate initialization logic as another constructor.

Changes

Analyzer: MinimizeDuplicateInitializationLogicAnalyzer:
- Detects duplicate initialization statements
Code fix provider: None
- The initialization logic of applications can be complex and a code fix provider can be equally complex to capture all cases of remediation. This implementation only shows areas of potential duplication.
Tests: Unit tests covering various positive and negative cases

Closes #57

coderabbitai[bot] commented 4 weeks ago

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@rjmurillo has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.

📥 Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b18a0997b354dd063bd8dd7b7f6660ac6e9833a and e7ed2061e3b9acee1bd4637ab3c95e354ded471d.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce a new diagnostic analyzer, MinimizeDuplicateInitializationLogicAnalyzer, aimed at detecting and reporting duplicate initialization logic in C# constructors. Additionally, a new package reference for Microsoft.Bcl.HashCode has been added to the project files. The pull request also includes updates to documentation, diagnostic identifiers, and benchmarking tests to validate the new analyzer's functionality.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
`Directory.Packages.props`	Added package version declaration for `Microsoft.Bcl.HashCode` version `1.1.1`.
`src/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/AnalyzerReleases.Unshipped.md`	Added new rule `ECS1400` for `MinimizeDuplicateInitializationLogicAnalyzer`.
`src/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/Common/DiagnosticIds.cs`	Introduced constant `MinimizeDuplicateInitializationLogic` with identifier `"ECS1400"`.
`src/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers.csproj`	Added package reference for `Microsoft.Bcl.HashCode`.
`src/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers/MinimizeDuplicateInitializationLogicAnalyzer.cs`	Implemented the `MinimizeDuplicateInitializationLogicAnalyzer` class with methods to analyze constructors.
`src/tools/Dogfood/Dogfood.csproj`	Added package reference for `Microsoft.Bcl.HashCode`.
`tests/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers.Benchmarks/Ecs1400Benchmarks.cs`	Introduced benchmarks for the `MinimizeDuplicateInitializationLogicAnalyzer`.
`tests/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers.Tests/MinimizeDuplicateInitializationLogicTests.cs`	Added unit tests for the `MinimizeDuplicateInitializationLogicAnalyzer`.

Possibly related issues

rjmurillo/EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers#57: This pull request directly addresses the issue of minimizing duplicate initialization logic in constructors, as outlined in the issue description.

Possibly related PRs

#66: This PR is related as it also contributes to enhancing code quality within the EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers project, focusing on initialization logic and maintainability.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

codacy-production[bot] commented 4 weeks ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: -0.29% (target: -1.00%)	:white_check_mark: 84.25%

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (4f81c725f45a7b65dc74f50667fcf8be266f98cb) | 1250 | 1093 | 87.44% | | | Head commit (e7ed2061e3b9acee1bd4637ab3c95e354ded471d) | 1377 (+127) | 1200 (+107) | 87.15% (**-0.29%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#70) | 127 | 107 | **84.25%** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

rjmurillo / EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers