Closed rjmurillo closed 3 weeks ago
[!WARNING]
Rate limit exceeded
@rjmurillo has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 25 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review.
⌛ How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.🚦 How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.📥 Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6724bf3b38d25a9cf54f1cdebe95eb7249a94f89 and 58f8aa195543d756d581a9a68812f21834b0c0a9.
This pull request introduces two main changes: an update to the SHA identifier in the build/perf/baseline.json
file, reflecting a new release version, and the addition of a new rule in docs/rules/ECS1400.md
aimed at minimizing duplicate initialization logic in C# constructors. The changes focus on improving code quality and maintainability by promoting constructor chaining.
File | Change Summary |
---|---|
build/perf/baseline.json |
Updated SHA identifier from 9144e7c2240d02021734e67795adc2f4096d15ce to 6724bf3b38d25a9cf54f1cdebe95eb7249a94f89 for release version 0.1.0 . |
docs/rules/ECS1400.md |
Introduced a new rule ECS1400 to minimize duplicate initialization logic in C# constructors, providing guidelines and examples. |
ECS1400
directly addresses the issue of minimizing duplicate initialization logic in constructors, which is the core objective of this issue.build/perf/baseline.json
file to modify the SHA identifier, indicating a direct connection.ECS1400
, which is thematically related to improving code practices regarding initialization logic.Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Coverage variation | Diff coverage |
---|---|
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%) | :white_check_mark: ∅ |
Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more
Related to #70
Summary by CodeRabbit