rjmurillo / EffectiveCSharp.Analyzers

Many of the recommendations in the book Effective C#: 50 Specific Ways to Improve Your C# can be validated by Roslyn-based analyzers and code fixes.
MIT License
2 stars 1 forks source link

Update basic documentation and add analyzer documentation and process #8

Closed rjmurillo closed 3 months ago

rjmurillo commented 3 months ago

Changes

codacy-production[bot] commented 3 months ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%) :white_check_mark:
Coverage variation details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (15bc4cdcbd45adb2222f972611f353a937913ae7) | 229 | 165 | 72.05% | | | Head commit (b399ef9f3d42d68e32f720ff6fce15d90186161f) | 229 (+0) | 165 (+0) | 72.05% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `
Diff coverage details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#8) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences


:rocket: Don’t miss a bit, follow what’s new on Codacy.

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more