Closed smartie2076 closed 3 years ago
Expected energy system:
Received energy system:
First commit is the unchanged json file that I received, and the following commits patch the json file until it is usable. I have not seen if this file was created within the grid model view in the EPA, because I expected it should be evident if the energy system is divided into multiple parts. Please PM me if you have an access code for that.
I personally think that it was not quite clear that the energyProviders
auto-generate necessary sub-assets within the MVS, and it is not necessary to do so in the EPA. These are excess assets because of that:
Grid_DSO_consumption_period
and Heat_DSO_consumption_period
(in energyConversion
)Grid_DSO_consumption
and Heat_DSO_consumption
(in energyProduction
)Also, the energyProviders
of Electricity
and Heat
were not connected to the electricity (Electricity
) or the heat (Heat
) bus, but to Electricity_pdp
and Heat_pdp
bus. If the test was generated with the EPA, this should have shown up as three individual, non-connected trees in the model view...
@Isidoros, @Dimitrios: Some of the remarks above could be about our MVS-EPA parser! I do not have the output json of the EPA at hand at the moment to check.
Fixed the EPA-MVS parser (see commits)
Debugging faulty input file from EPA to MVS