Closed FredericHirschmueller closed 3 years ago
PR #100 has been updated accordingly, thank you for the comment
The way to go is to write fix #101
in the description of #100, so when it gets merged, it closes this issue automatically :D
The way to go is to write
fix #101
in the description of #100, so when it gets merged, it closes this issue automatically :D
Actually this is not necessary since the PR has been linked from here already:
Nevertheless, does that make it easier to read when someone in a distance future searches for this? Because technically, this issue has been adressed so it could be closed
Technically the issue has been addressed when the branch is merged in dev
, this is not the case yet. (things could go banana and #100 end up deleted and not merged, then we did not solve the issue but think we did because we closed it already)
I did not know the button to link the issue, I think I still prefer explicitly writing Fix #issuenumber as per the "explicit over implicit" principle.
We have to make two different outputs with two different units: installed power [kW] installed capacity [kWh]