Minimal syntactic { include r1; include r2; ... } should use typing to know the field that are present.
The same notation for type is just some kind of higher order function performing some computation on type.
The general include for a record of unknown type (or default record value) seems too hard at the moment,
especially for compilation.
Minimal syntactic { include r1; include r2; ... } should use typing to know the field that are present. The same notation for type is just some kind of higher order function performing some computation on type.
The general include for a record of unknown type (or default record value) seems too hard at the moment, especially for compilation.