Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
in addition, how about adding extensions to darwin core? would that be useful
too?
Original comment by eightyst...@gmail.com
on 11 Nov 2008 at 6:35
Allowing any field on input is too much to try to do for Release 1.0. Need to
decide
if the proposed solution - to expand Darwin Core - is satisfactory. New Darwin
Core
(http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/index.htm) is much expanded over the previous
version.
Original comment by gtuco.bt...@gmail.com
on 7 Mar 2009 at 5:23
Are we going with the expanded DwC on release 1.0? If so, I think that is fine
and
we can close this issue if its already implemented.
Original comment by ckre...@gmail.com
on 8 Jun 2009 at 6:44
I do not think new DarwinCore is implemented, but this should still be a target
for a later release. See http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/index.htm
Original comment by tom.alln...@gmail.com
on 26 Jul 2010 at 3:35
If the upgrade to standard Darwin is accomplished, then REBIOMA will have the
Darwin Core term dynamicProperties
(http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/index.htm#dynamicProperties), which will solve
the problem of allowing any additional key:value pairs of information to be
included in the core record. This could conceivably be text indexed for search
ability as well. So, if Issue #354 was complete, it would take care of this
issue as well, according to Claire's comment #3.
Original comment by gtuco.bt...@gmail.com
on 17 Feb 2011 at 9:31
When issue #354 is complete, include help topic that explains how to use the
dynamicProperties of DWC; that will help to resolve this issue for others in
the future
Original comment by tom.alln...@gmail.com
on 18 Feb 2011 at 3:19
Original comment by ajmrakot...@gmail.com
on 20 Oct 2011 at 7:27
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ranaivoj...@gmail.com
on 11 Nov 2008 at 1:33