Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
quality scoring should support occurrence property labels. for example, a
negative
score because of a suspect CoordinateUncertaintyInMeters property value should
be
labeled with a 'Property-CoordinateUncertaintyInMeters' label.
Original comment by eightyst...@gmail.com
on 13 Nov 2008 at 2:07
Need feedback on whether this is appropriate and desired.
Original comment by gtuco.bt...@gmail.com
on 7 Mar 2009 at 6:04
Something like this is desired and should replace 'certification' (very
strongly our
users do not want their data "certified" or not -- but they do accept quality
labeling). For starters however, I think that rather than voting, we should
only
allow our Taxonomic Review Board members to do this.
What I'm not sure about is whether the quality label should be applied to the
whole
record, and the comments to particular fields. I think we need to sit down
and work
it thru.
Related to this, we should get rid of the term Certified and the ability to
search
for "All Certified" data
Original comment by ckre...@gmail.com
on 8 Jun 2009 at 6:49
virtually all of this has been implemented (at the record level) in recent
releases
Original comment by tom.alln...@gmail.com
on 14 Feb 2011 at 10:37
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
eightyst...@gmail.com
on 13 Nov 2008 at 2:00