Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This solution to this issue needs to be better defined.
Original comment by gtuco.bt...@gmail.com
on 22 Mar 2009 at 4:35
Original comment by gtuco.bt...@gmail.com
on 22 Mar 2009 at 4:48
see issue 282
Original comment by ckre...@gmail.com
on 8 Jun 2009 at 7:07
Issue 247 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by tom.alln...@gmail.com
on 18 Feb 2011 at 3:27
Issue 282 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by tom.alln...@gmail.com
on 18 Feb 2011 at 3:36
[deleted comment]
needs additional elaboration but this takes care of several related issues
pertaining to the obfuscation of private data. Data remain private but
information is available to other users about the existence/ownership of the
data. Users can then contact the owner if they require additional information.
Without this, users have no way of knowing this data exists
Two ways of implementing
- When any user searches for occurrence data, private records are returned but
show only taxonomic information, and the owner/institution (and email if that
was provided). Data are not mapped and no other fields are shown in any way
- When a user downloads a model, the model shows records that were used to
produce the model (issue #361); include here also the owner/institutions of
private records that went into the model
Also to do: update help so that providers of private data are aware that this
level of information will be provided
Original comment by tom.alln...@gmail.com
on 18 Feb 2011 at 3:43
Very Important : When a user downloads a model, the model shows records that
were used to produce the model (issue #361); include here also the
owner/institutions of private records that went into the model. till now, no
way top do that
Original comment by ajmrakot...@gmail.com
on 20 Oct 2011 at 7:30
Presence of private records in models has been implemented (model manager);
however issue #361 is still open because this refers to the need for
recommended citation in occurrence (not model) downloads
Original comment by tom.alln...@gmail.com
on 22 Nov 2011 at 11:15
closing because we think it's better to never show anything about private
records to anyone (apart from the TRB). In addition, the model-manager will be
changed so that emails are not shown in model metadata
Original comment by tom.alln...@gmail.com
on 29 Oct 2012 at 9:17
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
eightyst...@gmail.com
on 14 Nov 2008 at 6:26