Open soapdog opened 4 years ago
Thanks for the message. Yes, I would be happy with adding support for libsodium APIs.
I glanced over the page you linked to, and the missing features that I noticed were sealed boxes, secret boxes, and conversion from ed25519 (signing) keys to curve25519 (DH) keys. Are there any others needed?
Here are my thoughts on implementation:
sodium-x25519-key%
.sodium-ed25519-key%
.I've created a branch b-sodium-api
with a partial implementation.
this is fantastic @rmculpepper. I will fetch that branch and start studying it so that I can help. Thanks a lot for helping me out.
Hi,
I'm working with the Secure Scuttlebutt protocol which makes heavy use of many high-level libsodium APIs. I noticed that this package is not exposing sealed and secret boxes and other features from that library.
I don't know if the maintainers of this package are interested in such features or if I should work on creating a separate sodium package. I decided to check here if a PR for such features is OK before I start coding anything.