ISSUE_CE_023: 2015-02-02 Cecil County- Brudis Stormwater Recommended site conflict w/ Tree Site Selection Recommended Sites

[kerrymcmahon]

WHAT - There are 7 planned stormwater sites in Cecil county that are "recommended for restoration" after desktop evaluation - they have not been visited in the field. Consultant created over 600 recommended stormwater sites therefore reshaping or removing from consideration should be possible.

CONFLICT - TREE_SITE_SELECTION sites that are in "recommended"

ACTION NEEDED - Stormwater/Tree teams must rework sites that are overlapping, and be aware of sites that are within 15 feet of existing plantings.

SHAPE LOCATION - The master geodatabase is located on Projectwise - The feature name is PLANNING_CONFLICT_LOCATIONS, The issue number is ISSUE_CE_023.

pw:\SHAVMPWX.shacadd.ad.mdot.mdstate:SHAEDMS01\Documents\Areawide Projects\AW-82 TMDL\02 Implementation & Monitoring\SWM\New BMPs\GIS Updates\2014-11-17-Backlog_Conflicts\2014_Stormwater_Tree_Conflicts_Database.zip

NOTE - The PLANNING_CONFLICT_LOCATION feature represents the location of the conflict. These must be viewed with the TREE SITE SELECTION and EFF_BMP_PLANNED featureclassses.

[SRF-NMP]

Since these are noted to be in a tree contract, should they be in LUCHANGE? Or are they about about to be put into a contract?

[kerrymcmahon]

I am not sure where it is noted that these are in a contract. Please identify where this is shown. As far as I can tell, these are just in Tree Site Selection as "Recommended"

[nbyers1]

Kerry, the initial issue description you give above indicates that the sites are in a contract for 2015 under the 'CONFLICT' heading.

[SRF-NMP]

Kerry,

Since I will be having the consultant simply change the status of these to FC, do you want an official submittal from them on PW with status changes (no reshaping at this stage)? Alternatively, I could simply notify them, and notify you once I have confirmed that they have acknowledged and made the status change. Do you have a preference, since they won't be reshaping anything at this stage? Thanks!

[kerrymcmahon]

No, they do not need to resubmit. I will trust that you will have them modift the data accordingly, and I will also do this on my end. This issue is now closed.

[SRF-NMP]

Thanks, Kerry! I notified the consultant. Email below.

From: Susan Foster Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 3:52 PM To: 'SAshraf@brudis.com' Subject: Cecil County Gr2- BAI Potential BMP Conflicts with Tree Planting Areas (Tree Site Selection):

Saleem,

I’m working with Kristin on the TMDL program and assisting in coordination efforts to identify and resolve potential BMP conflicts with tree planting areas. I am notifying consultants of conflicts so that they can be aware of nearby tree planting areas. A group of seven potential BMP sites identified through your desktop evaluation conflict with tree site selection planting areas. Since these BMP sites are within boundaries of potential tree plantings that may soon be put in a contract, the potential BMP footprints should be reclassified as Future Consideration by the consultant in order to avoid a conflict with the tree planting area footprint. The following seven sites below (identified as EFF_BMP_PLANNED_IDs in the database) should be reclassified as Future Consideration in your database so as to avoid a conflict. This will be updated in the SHA-maintained database, so no additional submittal with these status changes is required.

b753ee9f-2744-4300-ba52-1779606275f7 98dd3281-abaf-4439-adde-01c77d167693 673d8bdc-9df6-4258-a07a-840a6ac0cd99 628bb4d9-75cd-40da-bd3d-d5be4f0ef012 b3033e38-f35e-4b87-b753-24f007c32374 1e535aab-e89c-4fab-b00e-b9e50d7b4b1f 263372e8-01e4-4147-912e-be24b84d9db1

Please let me know if you have any questions!

Thanks,

Susie

[SRF-NMP]

Consultant has acknowledged and will change. Email below:

From: Saleem Ashraf [mailto:sashraf@brudis.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 10:51 AM To: Susan Foster Subject: RE: Cecil County Gr2- BAI Potential BMP Conflicts with Tree Planting Areas (Tree Site Selection):

Hi Susan,

I was out of office for the last few weeks. We will reclassify the BMPs, as indicated in your email below.

Saleem