rms-support-letter / rms-support-letter.github.io

An open letter in support of Richard Matthew Stallman being reinstated by the Free Software Foundation
https://rms-support-letter.github.io/
GNU General Public License v3.0
2.33k stars 4.36k forks source link

Chatrooms #1863

Open nukeop opened 3 years ago

nukeop commented 3 years ago

Discord: https://discord.gg/7FWkxG4CsU

Matrix.org: #free-rms:matrix.org

nukeop commented 3 years ago

Yeah I know - non-free

shenlebantongying commented 3 years ago

Cannot we just chat here? Its perfect enough somehow. You cannot expect someone to download a big electron app.

nukeop commented 3 years ago

We can - this is completely optional. Discord is also available via web interface.

clort81 commented 3 years ago

Why would you use censor-heavy chat platforms? There's talko.cc, there's rizon IRC.

nukeop commented 3 years ago

100-1000x more people use Discord. That's the reality. I've never seen anything censored on Discord anyway, and I don't see why they'd seek to do anything to a small chatroom of this letter's supporters. If you want to create chatrooms there, please by all means do, and I'll add links. Also looking for someone to maintain a Matrix.org room...

clort81 commented 3 years ago

Don't use it. That's the reality. It's evil. That's the reality.

nukeop commented 3 years ago

Lots of people were also saying to not use Github (I don't think even RMS himself is that extreme). If we did that there would be no letter, no community, no support, and no opposition to the open-letter.

brown121407 commented 3 years ago

@clort81 if you know how to create and manage a channel on IRC, please do. I'm sure a lot of us would love to join (me included), and we can link that besides the Discord and Matrix.

shenlebantongying commented 3 years ago

There is an official #fsf channel, we don't have to create a new one. https://www.gnu.org/server/irc-rules.en.html

nukeop commented 3 years ago

Isn't it controlled by the non-board members opposed to RMS?

shenlebantongying commented 3 years ago

I am sure that #fsf is run by fsf people.

brown121407 commented 3 years ago

Some are now talking in favor of RMS right now on #fsf so it might not be a bad idea to point people there. At least maybe we can turn the tide there in the positive direction if some oppose. (Assuming we behave ourselves.)

m-ar-c commented 3 years ago

I have an xmpp server, do you want me to create a jabber public chatroom ?

shenlebantongying commented 3 years ago

I do think we should remove discord on the README. Also Discrod has been bought by Microsoft recently.

nukeop commented 3 years ago

If we remove it no one will join. It's completely optional, if you feel it's not for you, just don't join it.

nukeop commented 3 years ago

I have an xmpp server, do you want me to create a jabber public chatroom ?

Sure

purplesyringa commented 3 years ago

I've moved Discord to the bottom of the list and added IRC and matrix.org. I'm closing this issue now because there are too many open issues already and everything is now on README. Please create a PR if you create a new room somewhere (e.g. XMPP, would be awesome).

m-ar-c commented 3 years ago

Ok, here it is: xmpp:support-rms@conf.marc-o.win?join . Before making it public it would be useful to test it (I only made private room for friends and family already on my server so far).

So please join :)

nukeop commented 3 years ago

Let's keep it opened and pinned so more people know where to go to chat

purplesyringa commented 3 years ago

Let's keep it opened and pinned so more people know where to go to chat

We already have the list on README, no?

nukeop commented 3 years ago

Yeah, but some redundancy is needed as people land in the repo in different subpages. I'd like to keep the most important links from organizational point of view pinned here.

venomega commented 3 years ago

what about using bridges between the rooms?

purplesyringa commented 3 years ago

It'd be nice, but all bridges I know have ~ 5 minute delay which is very bad for active conversations. Do you know any fast bridge?

RealJTG commented 3 years ago

@imachug check https://github.com/42wim/matterbridge - "bridge between mattermost, IRC, gitter, xmpp, slack, discord, telegram, rocketchat, twitch, ssh-chat, zulip, whatsapp, keybase, matrix, microsoft teams, nextcloud, mumble, vk and more with REST API"

venomega commented 3 years ago

i tested matterbridge before, it works great

shenlebantongying commented 3 years ago

No, we should try not to use/support any proprietary platforms. That's against what we are doing. IRC is good, gitter is ok.

But not discord or slack. That horrible things for us.

M-i-k-o-t-o commented 3 years ago

@m-ar-c

Ok, here it is: xmpp:support-rms@conf.marc-o.win?join . Before making it public it would be useful to test it (I only made private room for friends and family already on my server so far).

"remote server not found"

@shenlebantongying I agree with you, although the sad part is that github itself is a nonfree platform.

nukeop commented 3 years ago

By definition, platforms aren't free or non-free, only their clients can be (server software is typically not distributed).

But I am ok with using proprietary software if it furthers my goals. It's a tradeoff, and not all proprietary software limits your freedom in the same way. Some limit it in ways that are insignificant compared to the benefits you gain from them, especially short term. I know it's all heresy but it's an unassailable fact that without the "proprietary" platform of Github we would have 10-20 signatures and not 2000.

jobbautista9 commented 3 years ago

The FSF uses Twitter (which is proprietary), if I remember correctly. GNU also writes free software in proprietary operating systems. It's a necessary evil.

If you're concerned about Discord, you can always use a discord-to-irc proxy (like bitlbee's discord gateway). Or just not use it at all and stick with IRC.

There are also people who are not 100% supportive/purist of free software, but are concerned about FLOSS being attacked by the woke pseudo-leftist mob. They might be using Discord. We shouldn't alienate those allies.

xTpx commented 3 years ago

Why support GNU Emacs on Windows?

We hope that the experience of using GNU Emacs on Windows will give programmers a taste of freedom, and that this will later inspire them to move to a free operating system such as GNU/Linux. That is the main valid reason to support free applications on nonfree operating systems. https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_mono/efaq-w32.html#Why-Emacs-on-Windows

crappyrules commented 3 years ago

I do think we should remove discord on the README. Also Discrod has been bought by Microsoft recently.

github was bought by microsoft too brainlet

kompowiec commented 3 years ago

Yeah I know - non-free

absolutely proprietary

Aspie96 commented 3 years ago

Why discord and not gitter?

nukeop commented 3 years ago

We already have 6 different channels, which is already almost too much for me to handle - I don't really want to add any more.

m-ar-c commented 3 years ago

@M-i-k-o-t-o

@m-ar-c

"remote server not found"

Sorry I just saw your message (way too much notifications these days :o). It should work now. Tell me if it doesn't.

andrew-phi commented 3 years ago

@m-ar-c server does not exist.

m-ar-c commented 3 years ago

@M-i-k-o-t-o @andrew-phi Ok, now it should really work ! DNS issue.

m-ar-c commented 3 years ago

5 people on the jabber room support-rms@conf.marc-o.win . Working well. You can make it public if you want.

venomega commented 3 years ago

5 people on the jabber room support-rms@conf.marc-o.win . Working well. You can make it public if you want.

how can i join in? i`m using profanity, i dont have a user there either

m-ar-c commented 3 years ago

@venomega I don't know or use profanity, but the documentation ( https://profanity-im.github.io/guide/0100/rooms.html#joining-a-chat-room ) says you need to do /join room@conference.server.com . In this case it would be /join support-rms@conf.marc-o.win

cmpunches commented 3 years ago

Hey can we remove the Libera mentions?

That shift in staff is not being presented correctly and consists mostly of toxic admins that were driven out by new ownership at freenode after decades of them abusing people on their network -- I don't think you want to associate that effort with this project because in less than 48 hours it has basically become a toxic admin paradise.

nukeop commented 3 years ago

It's just a chatroom, I don't know what you're talking about.