Closed ghost closed 3 months ago
Sorry, I have no plan to do that.
OK.
@iahunq2 Busybox already include a POSIX implementation of make.
@iahunq2 Busybox already include a POSIX implementation of make.
It's useless!
If the programs use non-standard feature of make is only their issue and their task to fix it. Just because developers like to use non-standard make features, it doesn't make a POSIX make any less useful.
I tried to compile it under MSYS2 (MSYS POSIX Environment) but I failed. The binary is created. But the tests failed.
https://www.crufty.net/help/sjg/bmake.html
It could live in busybox-w32 as bmake, so there will be no conflict with the default pdpmake.