Open emmatebibyte opened 3 months ago
I agree that switching to a more "real" license would be preferable. 0BSD may be preferable to CC0, since it is significantly shorter and more readable.
On 2024-09-08 01:05:45 -0700, "Avery" @.***> wrote:
I agree that switching to a more "real" license would be preferable. 0BSD may be preferable to CC0, since it is significantly shorter and more readable.
Does 0BSD have the same global fallback features as CC0 does for countries without or with different public domain systems?
-- Emma Tebibyte (fae/faer) http://tebibyte.media/~emma
It doesn't contribute the work to the public domain (explicitly) at all, it just gives "[permission] to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any purpose with or without fee". See: https://choosealicense.com/licenses/0bsd/
On 2024-09-29 20:08:53 -0700, "Avery" @.***> wrote:
It doesn't contribute the work to the public domain (explicitly) at all, it just gives "[permission] to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any purpose with or without fee". See: https://choosealicense.com/licenses/0bsd/
I suppose, then, that it is up to @rmyorston as to which of the two is preferable (if the license is to be changed).
-- Emma Tebibyte (fae/faer) http://tebibyte.media/~emma
I don't have an informed opinion on the relative merits of the licences mentioned here.
My preference is to take no action.
The Unlicense doesn’t dedicate the source code to the public domain in all jurisdictions. It also is not as battle-tested as CC0.
https://chrismorgan.info/blog/unlicense/ https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2012-January/001386.html