this would involve using the allBindingsAccessor, rather than just the valueAccessor. I am happy to make these changes & make a pull request if there is feedback that this is a useful (although breaking) change - I guess in the first instance both syntaxes should be accounted for.
I would not necessarily be opposed to allowing additional syntax, but it would be best to be backwards compatible. The other challenge that I see is that the existing value binding adds its own handlers.
in order to
I would suggest the binding syntax change from:
to
this would involve using the allBindingsAccessor, rather than just the valueAccessor. I am happy to make these changes & make a pull request if there is feedback that this is a useful (although breaking) change - I guess in the first instance both syntaxes should be accounted for.