Closed vincent23 closed 8 years ago
Section names could be defined implicitly by prefixing the uniform name with the section name and an underscore. E.g. "foo_dings1", "foo_dings2", "foo_dings_bla", "foo_dings_bla2" would result in:
What should be the behavior of both foo_dings and foo_dings_bla are used?
foo_dings
foo_dings_bla
Just don't use foo_dings and everything will be fine!
Just kidding, I'd suggest ignoring foo_dings and notifying the user.
finally
Section names could be defined implicitly by prefixing the uniform name with the section name and an underscore. E.g. "foo_dings1", "foo_dings2", "foo_dings_bla", "foo_dings_bla2" would result in: