Open yokat opened 1 year ago
Also consider the latest shapefiles.
related also to https://github.com/road86/bahis-dash/issues/30 which will be transferred to this issue and closed thereafter. Consider having an issue with basic reference data stored centrally.
Currently, the dashboard uses shape files from https://data.humdata.org/dataset/cod-ab-bgd They are compared to newbahis_geo_cluster.csv by looking, whether the geolocations in that file are within the shape files of humdata. As a second step some remainders are manually registered according to their names. manual=['Bandarban Sadar', 'Bijoynagar', 'Galachipa', 'Haim Char', 'Kalukhali', 'Kamarkhanda', 'Mehendiganj', 'Naikhongchhari', 'Paba', 'Ramu', 'Saltha', 'Tazumuddin', 'Zianagar'] It has been checked, that they do not have name twins. Lastly the shapefiles in larger cities contain more shapes, than bahis is using. These have to be changed manually.
@mixmixmix says to discuss with GroupMappers
Barishal: Bamna 100419 Manpura 100965 Tazumuddin 100991 Kanthalia 104243 Kala Para 107866 Rangabali 107897 Mathbaria 107958 Barishal Barguna Taltali Shapefile off and not showing
Chittagong: Bayejid Bostami 201506 Bakalia 201510 Chandgaon 201519 Chittagong Port 201520 Halishahar 201535 Khulshi 201543
Dhaka: Badda 302604 Biman Bandar Thana 302606 Cantonment 3026008 Dakshinkhan 302610 Demra 302612 Gulshan 302626
Khulna: Daulatpur 404721 Khalishpur 404745 Khan Jahan Ali 404748 Sonadanga 404785 Shyamnagar 408786
Mymensingh all seem ok
Rajshahi:
Singra 506991
Mathiar 508140
Rajpara 508185
Shah Makhdum 508190 check if these three before are integrated in other offices
Karmarkhanda 508844
Chauhali 508827
Rangur all seem ok
Sylhet: Sunamganj Sadar 609089 Balaganj 609108
Bug Description
Do we have to consider a rearrangement of any geolocation, e.g. the upazilas, and if so, what do we need to consider, when things change? Refers also to dashboard @yokat
To Reproduce
Expected Behaviour
No response
Additional Context
No response